Letter From a Reader
Nina Barufaldi St.Germain
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR POLICY
While we do not solicit them, we do welcome letter submissions to The Bar Harbor Story; for details on our policy, please visit our about page and scroll down or just visit here.
The beliefs, opinions, and viewpoints expressed by the writers of letters to the editor (letters from our readers) and included here do not necessarily reflect the beliefs, opinions, and viewpoints or official policies of The Bar Harbor Story.
In the letter below, the bolded sections are from the letter writer herself, not us. The photo below is also from the letter writer who wanted it included.
Why Bar Harbor’s War on Tourism Is a Mistake
When did Bar Harbor’s municipal government decide that its imagination begins and ends with limiting and taxing the tourism industry?
Bar Harbor is revealing a troubling lack of imagination in addressing the town’s financial, housing, and vehicle challenges by reducing tourism, the very vehicle that has the capacity to solve our problems.
Bar Harbor’s Unique Balance of Resources
Bar Harbor’s natural beauty and economic prosperity are its two greatest assets. These resources will always exist in a delicate balance, and it’s the role of leadership to foster that balance thoughtfully. Unfortunately, recent policies have leaned into the idea that protecting one requires undermining the other. This approach lacks nuance and fails to recognize how economic vitality supports Bar Harbor’s youth and quality of life.
Tourism is not just a byproduct of our natural beauty—it’s a way to celebrate and sustain it. Revenue from the tourism industry funds local infrastructure, supports local non-profits, and provides meaningful jobs to low- and middle-income residents. When the town actively restricts this economic engine through hotel moratoriums, cruise ship limitations, and vacation rental regulations, it isn’t protecting Bar Harbor—it’s hamstringing the very industry that provides the actual solutions.
The Housing Crisis and the Role of Local Hotels
Bar Harbor’s housing crisis is undeniable. Our town’s youth population is shrinking, while our older population continues to grow. If we want to attract and retain young families and workers, the availability of workforce housing is critical. Yet, instead of focusing on solutions that work, the town is penalizing the very industry that has historically stepped up to address this issue.
Local hotel owners have been the only stakeholders to meaningfully invest in workforce housing by building apartments and rentals that directly support their employees. The belief that outside developers will come to our rescue is wishful thinking, and has already been proven false. Bar Harbor has not made the necessary land use changes to incentivize such projects. Without these changes, the burden falls on local businesses—primarily hotels—to keep our workforce housed and our economy running.
By targeting hotel growth with moratoriums and increased taxes, the town is effectively cutting off one of the only viable sources of workforce housing. Organizations like OPL, Witham Family Properties, Stay Bar Harbor, and individuals like Brian Shaw have made significant contributions to workforce housing over the last 20 years. These efforts are critical to keeping Bar Harbor functioning, yet the town’s actions dissuade further commercial investment, making it harder to address the housing crisis. This approach hinders the tourism industry, deepens the housing crisis, and makes it harder for Bar Harbor to attract the very people it needs to sustain its future.
The Backfire of Restricting Hotel Growth
Restricting hotel growth may seem like a straightforward way to manage Bar Harbor’s infrastructure and protect its natural beauty, but the reality is far more complicated. Policies like hotel moratoriums, vacation rental limitations, and cruise ship restrictions are counterproductive. Rather than reducing congestion or preserving the town’s character, these measures have unintended consequences that exacerbate the very problems they aim to solve.
By capping the number of available hotel rooms, Bar Harbor pushes visitors to stay in nearby towns, such as Trenton or Ellsworth. These visitors then drive into Bar Harbor, increasing vehicle congestion and parking issues. Additionally, when more visitors stay overnight elsewhere, the town loses out on the broader economic benefits that overnight stays provide—patronizing local businesses, dining in restaurants, and participating in recreational activities. The end result is a strained tax base, leaving residents to shoulder a greater share of the burden, and more congestion.
Furthermore, while the town imposes these restrictions on commercial businesses, non-profits—many of which are exempt from taxes—continue to expand. While non-profits provide valuable services, their growth doesn’t contribute to the town’s tax base. Instead, Bar Harbor’s policies create a lopsided dynamic where commercial growth is stifled, and the economic burden falls disproportionately on residents.
If Bar Harbor truly wants to reduce congestion and protect its natural beauty, it needs to think bigger. Solutions like investing in public transit, encouraging green tourism initiatives, and collaborating with local businesses on creative housing and infrastructure projects could address these challenges without sacrificing the town’s economic lifeblood. Restricting hotel growth isn’t a solution—it’s a setback.
The Point
Bar Harbor is at a crossroads. While the challenges of housing, vehicle congestion, and preserving natural beauty are undeniable, the solutions being proposed by the municipal government are short-sighted and counterproductive. By targeting the tourism industry with moratoriums, taxes, and restrictions, the town is alienating the very economic engine that drives innovative solutions.
It’s time for Bar Harbor’s leaders to rethink their approach. Instead of punishing tourism, they should be collaborating with local businesses, residents, and community organizations to create sustainable policies that support both the economy and the environment. With imagination and cooperation, Bar Harbor can address its challenges while preserving the delicate balance that makes this town so unique.
The tourism industry isn’t the enemy—it’s the key to our community success. Let’s treat it as such.
Sheesh. Heard it all before. Didn't buy it then, don't buy it now.
The premise of this letter is s false claim that there is "a war on tourism.'
That is the rhetoric of propaganda which tries to obscure and distort the facts. All which follows from the premise is also propaganda.
The majority of Bar Harbor voters want a sustainable balance of tourisms. That is not "a war." It is sound stewardship and advance planning.
Huh? I thought the author and her family of this article has been living and developing tourist hotels and restaurants…oops , mega B and B’s in Bar Harbor for decades. Dare I say this blatantly opinion letter is highly self serving?
Has she forgotten that the very corporations she praises that only under public pressure and zoning finally built some seasonal housing after years of using
unsafe houses in BH to stuff code breaking numbers of their seasonal workers into? Remember the life threatening fires at these death traps…
Moreover, has she forgotten how these very corporations heartlessly evicted BH year round residents from numerous affordable and low income apartments ..Acadia Apartments, Pleasant Street, etc., ? Those residents were forced out into a cold world of searching for a roof over their heads somewhere….certainly not in their home town.
It is not a “war on tourism”. The good people of Bar Harbor simply want a decent place to call home with a community of year round neighbors.