Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ezra Sassaman's avatar

Can you please fact-check Seth's comments on the solar array?

A. The terms of the project have not changed materially. (Full warrant here) https://barharbormaine.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Minutes/_06012022-3021

Voters approved this bond article in 2022:

Article R

BOND: Engineering, Design, Procurement, Construction, and Interconnection

of a Free Standing Solar Array located on Town-owned property

Shall the Town of Bar Harbor:

1. Authorize the Town Council to provide monies for engineering and

construction al free standing solar array on the Town owned lot, being Map

207 Lot 57 known as the HIGGINS PIT SOLAR ARRAY, to offset municipal

electrical demand, including all costs related to the following:

• Schematic design, design development, construction documents, and all

required permits from State and Local agencies.

• Utility interconnection application, studies and agreements.

• Equipment procurement and construction

• Access drive restoration

• Ecosystem, culture and archaeological resource analysis

• Project management and coordination

B. Second, the comment "the project was pitched that it wouldn’t be a significant cost to the taxpayers, but now the best option does show that cost." is incorrect. All options are still net-positive in cost for the town, which appears to be lost in translation somewhere.

As you reported, "The cash flow charts cover 30 years. The total estimated cumulative net savings for the model selling the RECs is $2,421,389 or $80,713 per year on average. The total estimated cumulative net savings for the model without selling the RECs is $1,239,739 or $41,325 per year on average."

There are reasonable critiques about the project being pitched to cover 84% of municipal electricity costs and now only covering 67% or the project initially promising much larger profits for the town and then needing to be downsized. But there is no world in which a net-positive cost project represents "a significant cost for taxpayers."

I would have liked to say this in the meeting but it was already really late and I didn't want to go down a rabbit hole :)

Best,

Ezra

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts