Plaintiffs in Cruise Ship Case File To Exclude Sidman Expert Rebutter Testimony
barharborstory.substack.com
BAR HARBOR—Plaintiffs in Association to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods (APPLL) et al vs. Town of Bar Harbor have filed documents in federal court to exclude Charles Sidman’s expert rebutter testimony. Sidman is a defendant intervenor in the case, which means he and the town are defending the recent cruise ship limit caps, which limit disembarkations by cruise ship passengers to 1,000 or less each day and places the changes within the town’s land use ordinance. That limit stemmed from a citizens’ referendum that was led by Sidman and passed 1,780 to 1,273 in November, 2022. Sidman is also a candidate for Town Council.
Plaintiffs in Cruise Ship Case File To Exclude Sidman Expert Rebutter Testimony
Plaintiffs in Cruise Ship Case File To…
Plaintiffs in Cruise Ship Case File To Exclude Sidman Expert Rebutter Testimony
BAR HARBOR—Plaintiffs in Association to Preserve and Protect Local Livelihoods (APPLL) et al vs. Town of Bar Harbor have filed documents in federal court to exclude Charles Sidman’s expert rebutter testimony. Sidman is a defendant intervenor in the case, which means he and the town are defending the recent cruise ship limit caps, which limit disembarkations by cruise ship passengers to 1,000 or less each day and places the changes within the town’s land use ordinance. That limit stemmed from a citizens’ referendum that was led by Sidman and passed 1,780 to 1,273 in November, 2022. Sidman is also a candidate for Town Council.